My reaction to Apple’s iPad (Part 2)

This is part 2 of the series on my take of the initial reaction to the announcement of Apple’s new creation the iPad. I have talked about the general responses and criticisms from the general view I gathered over the Internet and I will spend some time here to talk about what I think the future iPad will hold.

Some initial unanswered question

Prior to writing this part of the article, I had some unanswered questions as to some of the technical points of the iPad. Firstly is about the applications. How is it that the developer going to maintain two sets of a single application for two screen size of the iPhone/iPod Touch and the iPad not to mention the different UI interfaces such as menus, panes, and windows. I just went through the Apple SDK documentation and it did mentioned a feature call the Universal App where by a developer can maintain one binary for two different set of interfaces. So there you go; problem solved but am sure binary will be bigger from now on having two set of UI instructions.

At the event, Apple review to us the new iWorks for iPad. It looks great and not to mention cheap and at $9.99 it would definitely set a standard of how a software would cost in the future especially for those which are running on a Mac OS X platform. Now the question is since the iPad, like its counterparts (iPhone/iPod Touch) does not has a file folder hierarchy like the Max OS X does, how are the document files going to be stored and shared between a Mac? Would it work like how we sync our songs and videos? After much digging, the answer lies in what they call a Shared Folder.


Courtesy from weblogtip and Apple Inc

Honestly, I would prefer the iPad (even to the extend of iPhone and iPod Touch) to have a common folder system that can be access by all applications. Imagine if applications such as DropBox , iDisk or any other applications can have access to the same folder system, it would be perfect to integrate everything nicely and have files sync across the clouds transparently.

iPad and what the future holds

Content is King

As I have mentioned earlier, there are many strong reactions (positives and negatives) over the announcement of iPad. I am not going to say more about what people’s reactions are as I am sure you can google it. Now, let’s talk about what the future holds for iPad. Remember the reaction when iPhone was launched back in 2007? No multitasking, no apps, no 3G, too expensive , no copy-cut-paste, no MMS, no stylus and blah blah blah, and it will never sell; move back the clock to 2010 (3 years later) and we have over 40 million iPhones sold, over 140,000 applications and over 3 billion of applications downloaded. I am suspecting the same will be apply to iPad and 3 years from now you will see an iPad everywhere you go.

One interesting thing I noted over the Steve’s presentation; He emphasized, “We’re a mobile device company” but I think the subtle hint was “We are a media content delivery company”. Many wanted an iPad as a computer device that can perform like a netbook or a laptop. I think is safe to say Apple strategy since the day of the iPods has always been the contents rather than the hardware.  They want to be the King of contents, delivering a full spectrum of media experiences to its customers via its hardware. They started of with Music, then Movies (both rental and non-rental), Applications, Games, and now the “Print” media which are books, newspapers, magazines and comics. There is a reason after all when they changed their name from Apple Computer to Apple Inc; that’s to say we are now no longer just a Computer company, we are a content delivery company. One more thing I wanted to add into this is since now we have iTunes Store, AppStore and the latest iBooks Store, why not merge all this services into one single coherent store for instance an AppleStore? I hope Apple would take note on this.

Apple’s mobile devices roadmap

Let’s move beyond what the iPad can or cannot do for a while here. I think generally many people (unless you are a geek like me) missed something very important over this iPad announcement, and that is the new Apple A4 chip. For those of you who do not yet know, Apple had recently acquired a chip manufacturing company call P.A Semi and iPad is the first product in Apple’s range that uses its own CPU. SOC (Systems-on-a-chip).


Courtesy from  myuibe and Gizmodo

If you have watched the demo, you would have noticed how blazingly fast it was. The demo on the Maps application is super fast. And this A4 Chip, I believe will be the key towards the future road map of all Apple mobile devices maybe including the next generations of MacBooks. There is a good article written on this here by Daring Fireball.

The future of mobile applications

I am sure by now many existing iPhone apps developer will be cranking their thought processes into making use of the screen resolution to come out with some nifty innovations. I am very excited about this. Imagine having the ability to run an iPad version of Photoshop and do a quick editing while having a coffee at Starbuck laying down comfortably on a couch and immediately post the photo online. Ain’t this more true to a sense that a Tablet is more like a “Laptop” than a laptop? I am sure with such a big screen size, couple up with multi-touch and accelerometer, we are going to witness many applications yet to come that will blows your mind away, just like what happen to iPhone with Augmented Reality Apps and many other innovative apps such as those that enable us to search for news, foods or movies based on where we are.


Courtesy from mattbuchanan

My Final Note

The question now is would I buy one? Hell yeah! and I admit I am a sucker for all things Apple. Now, the next question is how and when am I going to use it since I already have a MacBook Pro and an iPhone? The answer is simple really. Doing all my work related stuffs while I am at my desk ie Word Processing, Photo Editing and whatever you can think off, I will stick to my MacBook Pro hooked up to my beautiful 30″ Apple Cinema Display. If I am on the road, walking around, or having a quick lunch I will use my iPhone. How is it I am going to use the iPad then? Say when I decide to laze on the couch or at Starbucks enjoying my coffee and killing time, it will be a good idea to catch up with blogs, perhaps editing one, catching up with my emails, doing some photo editing, reading an e-book, or even perhaps watching a movie with an iPad solely because of its screen size. Not that this cannot be done by a laptop or a netbook, but how many of us can truly lie down on a couch with those hot beast on our laps, right?

For those who were psyched about iPad and got disappointed after that is because they are having a mindset that a tablet is a can-do-all computer, very much what Microsoft is pushing but failed. Sorry folks, I don’t see it that way. If you want a computer go get a computer. iPad will never going to replace a Macbook or a Netbook. It is design for different set of purposes, hence if you have seen Steve Job’s presentation you will noticed he emphasize on one very important issue about iPad being in the third category of device in between a laptop and an iPhone:-

“If there is going to be a third category device, it has to be better at these kind of tasks (refering to Browsing, Email, Photos, Video, Music, Games and E-books) than a laptop or an iPhone”

So there you have it; my long winded analysis of what I gathered so far and what I think this mobile device will be in the future. And if you are like me, prepare to break your piggy and get swept away by the possibilities of what it can do.

Posted in Geek Speak | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

My reaction to Apple’s iPad (Part 1)

27th January 2010, was a day that many have been waiting anxiously over a period of time and the reactions even before Steve Jobs walked out of that stage was tremendous and surreal. Everyone that was on the Internet was busy scouring for last minute rumors and one particularly came from Jason Calacanis (Founder of Weblogs, Inc., TechCrunch50, Silicon Alley Reporter, Engadget & Mahalo.com) where I received many retweets stating that he somehow had his hand on the Apple tablet and was testing it for days and he is spilling the beans as his NDA expired that day. I admit I did go through his tweets but I was thinking to myself this must be a prank as I do not think for a person of his standing would reveal the details and jeopardizing his name.


Courtesy from myuibe and Apple Inc

So the time came, and Steve Jobs announced Apple’s latest creation, the iPad and reactions immediately poured in all over the twittersphere.  My reaction as do so many others was the name iPad. Boy, does it sounds like a Sanitary Pad. The best reaction came from Cult of Mac.

Well, like it or hate it, Apple does has the capability of turning a trivial name into a BRAND. Remember the days when Steve mentioned the death of the name PowerBook and is rebranded as MacBook Pro? We all hated it at first especially those hardcore Powerbook users like me. The strongest reaction was from Richard Tibbetts editor of Hyperextended Metaphor:-

I believed that PowerBook was one of the strongest brands in the high tech industry, and thought it was remarkably stupid to change it.

However many years later the name became the BRAND that just ingrained into many peoples mind and the word becomes something trivial to all. So it seems the reaction to the brand iPad would be a short term thing because many people in their mind (after reading all the rumor mills) were expecting something more fancy like iSlate (that even make Steve Ballmer quickly named his upcoming tablet as SlatePC) or something as trivial as the name iTablet. Enough said about that; let’s move on to my reaction over the iPad and what I think it would become and would not become.

iPad initial reactions

Firstly I would list down the many general complains I read over the twitter feed and try to put a response to it.

“What? no camera like an iPhone? This can’t be happening!”

OK! Why in the world would you want a camera on a Tablet? Wouldn’t it look odd taking picture with it? I think Steve Jobs is smart enough to know what make sense and what do not. Being said that, a webcam in front of the screen would make much more sense than having a camera at the back like an iPhone. For this reason I don’t know why it didn’t have one; could it be due to some technical reasons? I don’t know but I suspect future version of iPad will definitely have one. A hint to that is the built-in microphone which I suspect is for future use in video conferencing plus an interesting article posted here on an interesting SDK which allows you to take screenshot of yourself.

“Oh! It has no multitasking!”

This was something I wasn’t expecting too. I was thinking along the line that the new iPad would have a new kind of operating system that will revolutionize the tablet. But sadly to me is just another iPhone/iPod Touch OS that make its way into a larger screen format. Nothing as revolutionary as when iPhone was introduce with their Multi Touch technology.

“Why, Why..no Flash?”

Dude, FLASH for however great it is, is going to be a thing of the past with the introduction of HTML5 and AJAX. Just look at YouTube with the introduction of HTML5 videos recently. I see many potential for HTML5 especially for mobile devices over such thing as persistence storage for offline access and things like geo-location services such as the one which Google is using over iPhone and Android. In fact, I believe many developer are moving into this area as they can now develop a single set of application that will work across all kinds of devices that supports HTML5.

“Micro Sim what?”

Ok, I must admit I am not sure what is the decision behind using a Micro SIM as oppose to the usual SIM card that is common to all mobile phones like iPhone but I am sure we will have to judge it some other future times. One thing I know is Apple has the tendency to introduce something which are not common in the industry. (remember Firewire ?) I am not sure where this Micro SIM will be heading to but you can read more about it here.

“iPad is going to kill Kindle for sure”


Courtesy from myuibe and Apple Inc

I wouldn’t bet on it. Kindle is a totally different category all together. It was designed solely to read books and magazine whereas iPad was designed to be more of a jack of all trades media device like browsing, gaming, some editing (via its new iWork), photo viewing (perhaps some minor editing with upcoming apps?), movie watching, reading and perhaps more. Kindle uses Electronic Ink display whereas iPad uses a LED-backlit glossy widescreen display. I bet you can’t read a book under the bright sun light on a beach as you can with a Kindle. So there is no comparison at all when book reading is concern and not to mention the battery consumption of both 10 hours (according to Apple) vs. Kindle’s one week usage on a single charge. One thing I know for sure, thanks to Apple we can now possibly get a much cheaper Kindle.

Part 2 of this series I will touch on some unanswered question at least on my part on the iPad and my opinion on the future of what this platform holds.

Posted in Geek Speak | Tagged , , , , , | 5 Comments

Swedish Greys - a WordPress theme from Nordic Themepark.

  • Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • Facebook
  • Flickr